Owner of MP3.com replies to PLUG
You may remember this article on the mp3.com owner acquiring patent # 6,609,105 described as a "System and method for providing access to electronic works" dated August 19, 2003 by Sander (Alexander) van Zoest of mp3.com fame.
From: Sander van Zoest
To: jason@plug.ca
Subject: Patents
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:37:00 -0600
Hi Jason,As described in the comment, I have the idea that the only way to beat the patent system is to create patents that where we choose how to enforce them. Otherwise someone will just patent your idea and force you to give up on your idea. You can combat it with prior art, but patents are necessarily a bad thing. It is more a bad thing if you abuse them.A good example of this is Raph Levien.
See http://www.levien.com/patents.html
From: Sander van Zoest
To: jason@plug.ca
Subject: Patents
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:37:00 -0600
Hi Jason,As described in the comment, I have the idea that the only way to beat the patent system is to create patents that where we choose how to enforce them. Otherwise someone will just patent your idea and force you to give up on your idea. You can combat it with prior art, but patents are necessarily a bad thing. It is more a bad thing if you abuse them.A good example of this is Raph Levien.
See http://www.levien.com/patents.html
Cheers,
-- Sander
Perhaps we should invite a debate from other programmers such as the guys at Rainy Day software to debate Van Zoest on patent issues.


---
You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.